Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MARK209

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 02:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MARK209

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a band. The only sources are trivial mentions in local publications and a press release. Fails WP:BAND. - Mr X 19:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that the page does not meet WP:BAND; it should also be noted that a member of the band seems to have created the page, perhaps for promotional purposes. 331dot (talk) 21:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no claim of notability in the article, unsourced, web searches turn up concert announcements, press releases and blogs, fails WP:NBAND Kraxler (talk) 03:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - My searches found nothing better apart from non-significant coverage such as this. SwisterTwister talk 05:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.