Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAYA Design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MAYA Design

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whole article is nothing but a corporate spam, written like a brochure. It may be old, but does not establish any Wikipedia standards. Light2021 (talk) 16:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:PROMO. Corp spam, with copy such as "...MAYA helps companies design more usable and useful technology products, as well as information-rich services and environments." What does this even mean? :-) K.e.coffman (talk) 05:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Neither the provided references nor any sources from my searches rise above routine announcements. More is needed to demostrate that this is more than a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL firm going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 11:11, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. While sources might qualify as "independent", the article themselves do not meet the criteria for establishing notability. -- HighKing⁺⁺15:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.