Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MCM Electronics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MCM Electronics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic of this article does not meet WP:COMPANY. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article has suffient references. Why does it not meet WP:Company?--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as searches found nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Looking through the sources, 6 are basically about pages, 1 an earnings release announcement, and 3 don't exist. The last looks more like a school blog. I would think it fails WP:COMPANY. --Wirbelwind(ヴィルヴェルヴィント) 05:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG. Anything of note can always be added to the article of the parent company, Premier Farnell, to which this could be redirected. Edwardx (talk) 11:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.