Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MEMEnomics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:39, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MEMEnomics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for Non notable pseudo science book. Worldcat shows in it only 97 libraries, which is utterly trivial for a book of in this field . The references are almost entirely to PR sites connected with the book or the author. The contents of the article is an over-detailed presentation of the "Spiral Dynamics" theory, for which see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiral Dynamics. I have always supported the inclusion of straightforward explanatory articles on pseudoscience, because WP is the place for people to find objective information about anything weird of significance.But that's information Information, not promotion in in world context. And this particular self published book isn't even significant. The see also link to our more-than sufficient existing coverage of this general line of thought. DGG ( talk ) 18:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, crackpot spam. –Be..anyone (talk) 19:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.