Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIDIjam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MIDIjam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As much as I am a fan of MIDI music, there is not one single magazine or newspaper article in sight that even mentions "MIDIjam". The citations that are currently here are basically pages of the official website for the application's programmer, so the software is completely non-notable. 和DITOR E tails 03:32, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete I found this [1] which looks promising, but nothing else. I agree, that, for now there is simply not enough in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Happy Squirrel (talk) 20:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as none of this suggests a better notable article yet. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.