Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSBR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MSBR

MSBR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a largely self-published musician. I've been unable to find anything that would satisfy GNG. There are a few fan tribute sites and a couple of articles on some obscure record labels like Steinkalang Industries [1] and 4IB Records [2] but I don't think that passes GNG.

The biggest claim to notability is "collaboration" (however you want to interpret that) with some marginally notable acts. Working with others does not transfer notability. The Dissident Aggressor 15:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 13:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSBR, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.