Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSPX (Book Series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 00:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MSPX (Book Series)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book from a non-notable author, who's article has also been deleted (a7). Fails WP:NBOOK. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not meet any notability criteria per WP:BKCRIT and seems WP:TOOSOON as the book is yet to make an impact to claim significance. TopCipher (talk) 18:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I wish the author well, but this series just doesn't pass notability guidelines at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕��◕｡) 19:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as author has no article, there are no independent references, and I do not have this in my collection. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't meet WP:NBOOK. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:33, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.