Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MYLAPS Sports Timing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MYLAPS Sports Timing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should never have been released from Articles for Creation in 2012. It's had five years to be improved, but shows no signs of significant independent reliables coverage in general news (etc) sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Sionk (talk) 23:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The article is about a Dutch company and not a Danish one and this debate should therefore not be included in the Denmark-related deletion discussions but to the Netherlands-related deletion discussions.Ramblersen (talk) 11:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't see much out there for references in the English language. Of those I do, nothing would satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. Maybe if someone was able to provide something more substantial in Dutch. Otherwise, there really isn't anything that can be approved with the article. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is barely enough reference to meet WP:GNG. As a sport equipment company I believe much of reference to them (if they exist) should be online, but search shows nothing like WP:SIGCOV only their domain and adverts mentions kept showing up. The company exists, but is not notable. — Ammarpad (talk) 10:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- there is barely enough reference to meet WP:GNG - so you're saying they do meet GNG, or don't? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - They didn't, although some exists. "Bare" expresses not meeting threshold while acknowledging the effort to meet. — Ammarpad (talk) 06:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.