Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M Javad Javid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:39, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

M Javad Javid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not have the required notability of a living person to be included in the Wikipedia. The mentioned person has no serious controbution to the knowledge (i.e. highly cited publications) and the claims are misleading. Arashtitan (talk) 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 19:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 19:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Razr Nation 01:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but without prejudice against recreating if better sources can be found. Iranian academics are a place where we often lack access to sources that could prove notability if it existed; but it is the responsibility of the article authors to provide them. I can't find them here or on the net and don't know where to look. If recreated with sourcing, I wouldn't hold this AfD against it, but for now, delete. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 01:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.