Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macheboeuf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#3. Mz7 (talk) 04:36, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Macheboeuf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lackage of verifiable information Tonim 007 (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep - this is a disambiguation page so doesn't need to have 'verifiable information' Spiderone 16:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep per Spiderone. I'm not sure that putting a speedy deletion tag on the AfD itself is the right way to handle this so I am removing that. That is in no way an endorsement of the AfD itself. The speedy got transcluded into the deletion sorting list and that's probably not a good thing. If I am wrong about this then please just put it back. I know that speedy deletion is not meant to be replaced but if it was the right approach here then please just do it. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep At the risk of piling on, I believe this nomination was done in error. Capt. Milokan (talk) 22:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep per above. Both articles are suitably referenced. jp×g 03:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.