Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacroGeo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. Article was speedy deleted, rendering this discussion moot. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MacroGeo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability for this independent research provider. The article was deprodded by its creator William MI6. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 13:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete - apart from the blatantly promotional nature of the text (it's straight from their web page), I'm unconvinced by the sources I could find - there's coverage in what appear to be decent RSes, e.g. [1][2][3], but it's reporting on just the publicity announcement just two weeks ago and are very crystal-ball. WP:TOOSOON I think. If kept, this would be a paragraph announcing its recent founding and the principals - David Gerard (talk) 16:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- Subject lacks coverage in RS and appears to be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Meatsgains (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.