Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madi Monroe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:27, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Madi Monroe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This promotional article on an actress and social media "personality" (influencer) fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTRESS. While it seems that her TikTok is popular, popularity is not a guarantee of notability. A BEFORE search only finds social media posts, IMDb, user submitted content, and fluffy trivial coverage. There may be a COI present (which in itself is not a reason for deletion) as the editor who created it has a user name that is the same as the subject's mother's name (which is mentioned in the article.) That may be purely coincidental, however they also shot the photo used in the article which seems to indicate a connection. It seems to be WP:TOOSOON for this emerging actor. Netherzone (talk) 17:43, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Internet, and California. Netherzone (talk) 17:43, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per argument above plus the only sources are from user-generated content so almost as bad or worse as citing other Wikipedia pages. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 18:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:BEFORE search finds no sources on her from generally reliable sources; the few articles on her are hardly enough to establish notability as of now. jolielover♥talk 18:58, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, too soon if this subject is actually prominent in the future. -Samoht27 (talk) 19:43, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I completely agree the subject doesn't meet WP:NACTRESS. The Sophocrat (talk) 23:22, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Dance. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:24, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 15:38, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It seems like this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. There seems to be a few RSes but a lot of sources being used that do not qualify as RSes. Once there are more sources supporting it, it should be included. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 16:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete .. Has prospects but right now, notability requirements are missing.Maltuguom (talk) 19:57, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NACTOR fails but worse it looks like promo. Delete this. Iljhgtn (talk) 06:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.