Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magee v. McDonald's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to McDonald's legal cases#Discrimination. Information has already been merged. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 17:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Magee v. McDonald's

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not the news. Just another run of the mill lawsuit. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge - Keep, as this lawsuit is likely to have implications for how drive thru windows at restaurants operate in the future, even if only for newly constructed restaurants and not for those already built. If this article cannot be kept, it should be merged per WP:CHEAP with history in tact to McDonald's_legal_cases#Discrimination. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and Merge - I think WP:TOOSOON applies, given that the lawsuit has not yet resolved... that said, on the other hand, redirects are WP:CHEAP, and this is so short of a stub that merging it into McDonald's_legal_cases#Discrimination will be super easy. If this becomes more important in the future, it can be recreated with the additional details that become available, but we shouldn't have an independant article created until then. Fieari (talk) 06:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. At this point, the lawsuit could be dismissed. For now, it's just one of thousands of such suits that are filed every year. It's too soon even for a redirect. MB (talk) 04:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to McDonald's legal cases § Discrimination for the time being, where the information is duplicated at. However, no prejudice against recreation if the content in the redirect target were to be significantly expanded, warranting a split per WP:SPINOFF criteria #2. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:53, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.