Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmoud Omar Mohammed Bin Atef

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Guantanamo Bay detention camp. To allow merging of content from history if desired. Sandstein 14:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmoud Omar Mohammed Bin Atef

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unless being detained on charges of waging war against another country is default sign of notable, there is nothing notable about this individual. The articles are about the overall Guatanamo detainee program or lists of thsoe detained, nothing specifically focuses on him in an indepth way John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Yemen-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 01:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (selective) to Guantanamo Bay detention camp. Essentially a WP:COATRACK on Gitmo. There is some content (on the Ghana court case) worth having over there, and the name is a plausible search term. Icewhiz (talk) 14:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 03:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He just doesn’t have notability of himself, ironically. Trillfendi (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Point of order - nominator Johnpacklambert, may I remind you that when one nominates an article for deletion one is expected to leave a heads-up on the user talk page of the contributor who started that article? Our decisions are supposed to be made consensually. Disinviting those likely to disagree with your nomination is not the way to reach a genuine consensus. So, could you please be more careful? Geo Swan (talk) 02:46, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.