Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mail1Click
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Mail1Click
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mail1Click (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable product (does not meet either WP:NSOFT or WP:NPRODUCT), 100 hits on Google outside of Wikipedia mirrors, sources listed appear to be purely promotional articles. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
KeepDelete [1][2][3][4][5] Charmk (talk) 05:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)- None of the sources you linked meet WP:RS, one of them explicitly mentions that it is sponsored and most of the others are blogs, neither are those already listed in the article reliable. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:09, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Charmk (talk) 07:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- None of the sources you linked meet WP:RS, one of them explicitly mentions that it is sponsored and most of the others are blogs, neither are those already listed in the article reliable. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:09, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: In addition to weak sources, the article makes un-established WP:PUFFERY claims about the product's security. -- intgr [talk] 14:02, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.