Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major League Hacking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:32, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Major League Hacking

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, let alone WP:NCORP. Did a WP:BEFORE check and only fund more promo/passing sources from CrunchBase/Forbes ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Education, and Computing. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BEFORE and the article itself is promo.`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 16:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This does not seem accurate under the referenced criteria for significance or notable coverage for organizations. There are numerous "reliable" secondary sources of varying levels of significance and independence referenced on the article with differing points of view on the organization and its activities since 2013. 108.30.135.53 (talk) 18:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't see it. To which do you refer? FalconK (talk) 07:16, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV indeed. Note that I conducted a WP:BEFORE which led to this Teahouse discussion and then this AfD. Ovinus (talk) 22:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because of lacking the coverage required in WP:ORGCRIT. FalconK (talk) 07:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.