Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makrand sakharam sawant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Makrand sakharam sawant

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Strongly suspect this is a hoax - I think this page was moved from User:Makrand Sakharam Sawant. Can't seem to find reliable sources for him Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, vanity stunt, not notable. --Soman (talk) 17:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not only does it fail WP:GNG but good god what a mess! LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet WP:BIO criteria. Further, the article is very poorly written.--Rpclod (talk) 17:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:BLPNOTE. Flat Out let's discuss it 04:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A WP:SPA autobiography with no verifiable claim to notability. AllyD (talk) 06:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete. Maybe even Speedy Delete. Possible WP:COI in creation. Poor quality article. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. --Jersey92 (talk) 00:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Should this discussion be closed and the article deleted per WP:SNOW? --Jersey92 (talk) 00:08, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Delete. No credible notability claim, no WP:RS, etc. Agricola44 (talk) 14:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.