Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MalwareTech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to WannaCry ransomware attack. MBisanz ^talk 01:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MalwareTech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP1E Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to WannaCry ransomware attack, per WP:BLP1E. ansh 666 05:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect. Although I would favour deleting then creating a redirect if necessary. Only in death does duty end (talk) 12:38, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - err on the side of privacy here. The man is only notable in relation to a single event and hasn't enjoyed the publicity since. EA Swyer ^Talk _{Contributions} 14:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:06, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.