Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ManBearPimp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 13:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ManBearPimp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Up and coming young music artist, sadly seems to not yet meet WP:GNG for notability. The references provided are primarily campus newspaper commentary Gaff (talk) 16:48, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non notable, Self promotional article created today by newly registered editor User:Richyrams8. i suspect the additional newly registered editor User:ManBearPimp, who checked the article is a sockpuppet of the other. Richard Harvey (talk) 17:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The subject does not meet criteria in Wikipedia:Notability (music). Gnome de plume (talk) 20:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  11:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  11:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  11:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.