Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manfred Markus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 18:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manfred Markus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and Cannot see how they pass WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Language, Austria, and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. JSTOR isn't working for me right now but searching Google Scholar for intitle:"Manfred Markus" finds plenty of reviews of his books, enough for WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: JSTOR issues and a need to over gender sterilize, as "they" almost confused me. The subject appears to be an author, did have co-authors (21 scholarly books and over 100 articles), and the article seems to not be in question that the subject is a male, married with children, and I have seen no evidence there is any gender questioning. If I am wrong the article needs to reflect that as a grave error. Being presented a Festschriften seems to be a milestone, even if some of the content does not reflect all major achievements, but does indicate peer reviews. However, the article states:In 1981 he was appointed chairholder as a full professor of English linguistics and medieval English literature at the University of Innsbruck, Austria, and has been a professor emeritus since 2009. Being a "chairholder" is not the same as being awarded a Named chair, but the notability criteria #5 states;The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon. If I or anyone else has issues with WP:NPROF, lacking any verifiable issues with the sentence, this is not the venue for discussion. If the subject held a named chair, it seems he passes the criteria for a stand alone article. -- Otr500 (talk) 04:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Per User:Otr500. Shoerack (talk) 17:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.