Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manhattan Review (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manhattan Review

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't satisfy corporate notability, or even differentiate it from the thousands of similar test prep startups. As the article states, it "has been mentioned" in several respected outlets, but they are exactly that, mere mentions, and do not have the depth needed to advance a case for notability. Furrykiller (talk) 00:47, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:48, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:48, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The WP:SPA editor who added the media coverage during the 2013 AfD at least described them as mentions rather than substantial coverage. That problem remains: my own searches are not locating the substantial coverage which would be needed to support notability, whether as company or product. AllyD (talk) 07:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If the best you can do is "mentions", that is the very definition of failing WP:CORPDEPTH. shoy (reactions) 13:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Searching does not find any substantial coverage needed for this to pass WP:COMPANY. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 17:56, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:NCORP, clear COI. DrStrauss talk 12:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.