Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manifold Vector Machine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 12:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Manifold Vector Machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be original research, published only in the article creator's blog. A Google Scholar search reveals no mention of this in any published paper. Balkywrest (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nomination. We don't publish original research and searches in WorldCat, JSTOR and "Manifold+Vector+Machine" Google Scholar bring up nothing. A Google Books search brings up one Scribd article but that is not a reliable source due to lack of editorial oversight. SITH (talk) 12:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. This is pure Original Research. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:28, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no substantial references to counter personal synthesis. Most likely Original research. Rekonedth (talk) 12:32, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow delete as per all the others - this is WP:OR and the term is not in general use, nor does it appear in peer-reviewed papers. Neiltonks (talk) 13:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 17:10, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.