Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manjotha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:06, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manjotha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that they are notable Boleyn (talk) 09:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Aside from the unreliable Horace Rose (Glossary of the Tribes and Castes), I haven't been able to find anything that even discusses this community. - Sitush (talk) 17:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- dubious and not supported by RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:DEL7. I insist on scholarly sources for ethnicity related articles. This one doesn't make the cut. One of the spellings does have some coverage although one of them is a colonial era book. I found one SPS here, though it also uses a 1911 census data. Nothing much in contemporary academic literature though. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:40, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.