Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mano Swartz Furs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 23:33, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mano Swartz Furs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I sawn that article as promotional and non-noable. Fails WP:GNG. Delete as proposer. KGirlTrucker87^{talk what I'm been doing} 20:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, destroy and SALT -- blatant business advertising, Quis separabit? 14:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I reviewed this and, examining it closely now finally suggests nothing at all for any applicable notability, searches have found nothing better. The history suggests there are chances and this is why I would not have nominated sooner but there's currently nothing convincing of these improvements. SwisterTwister talk 04:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.