Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Nair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manoj Nair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant in-depth coverage in reliable sources, i.e. fails WP:ANYBIO. Heavily promotional. Rentier (talk) 14:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

• Keep The facts mentioned in the site are correct. It could be corroborated objectively via various other sources as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.99.105.214 (talk) 14:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC) — 125.99.105.214 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Removed references to some of the company claims to make it neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:a000:d485:8a00:887:81a0:c2d0:ac9b (talk) 18:27, 26 September 2017 (UTC) — 2605:a000:d485:8a00:887:81a0:c2d0:ac9b (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Keep Has removed major areas where it seemed to be making it look promotional. The page may now be taken off from the delete list. The facts mentioned are True and could be corroborated via various other channels. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danalazzar (talk • contribs) 03:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC) — Danalazzar (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Delete fails WP:BIO and even his company is not notable.122.171.75.98 (talk) 14:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non notable individual. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The data sets are accurate. The company has been massively covered in news outlets in India. It is claimed by various media outlets to be the only global venture that allows rentals to transact via credit cards without the customer having to leave the card details on a third party portal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danalazzar (talk • contribs) 05:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC) — Duplicate vote: Danalazzar (talk • contribs) has already cast a vote above.[reply]
• Keep The individual is covered extensively by Forbes. *<Type - Manoj Nair, Forbes> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danalazzar (talk • contribs) 05:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC) — Duplicate vote: Danalazzar (talk • contribs) has already cast a vote above.[reply]
• Keep All the media articles/references mentioned in this page are authentic. This company is creating waves in Indian real estate rental sector. Even Forbes ran an article on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:a000:d485:8a00:9c97:9b89:4002:8d65 (talk) 12:29, 28 September 2017 (UTC) — 2605:a000:d485:8a00:9c97:9b89:4002:8d65 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Keep For each fact and opinion mentioned, there are multiple sources of 3rd party references to corroborate the material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:a000:d485:8a00:9c97:9b89:4002:8d65 (talk) 14:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC) — Duplicate vote: 2605:a000:d485:8a00:9c97:9b89:4002:8d65 (talk • contribs) has already cast a vote above.[reply]
• Note I've semi protected this page owing to the excess amount of sock/meat participation. I'll leave it to someone else to sign and tag all those. —SpacemanSpiff 15:39, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NBIO. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 02:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article is well referenced, and subject is notable. --Axiomus (talk) 12:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Image has copyright problems. Full of personal unreferenced details. Likely paid for. Not really notable. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.