Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manu Daftary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. No comments after two relistings so I'm closing this as No consensus. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manu Daftary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little on the page which would appear to count towards notability. He manages money and investment, not clear that he is even notable within that group of people. I can't find anything else which would count towards BLP JMWt (talk) 10:45, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 10:45, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable money manager, no hits found for him (and only three total on the name).Not meeting GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 14:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep: It appears that there has been some spotty coverage on the subject from various newspapers, although much of it has more to do with the fund itself. A possible solution is to delete this article and merge relevant content to a new article about the fund. [[1]][[2]][[3]][[4]] User:Let'srun 12:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep also. The two Philly Inquirer articles found by User:Let'srun certainly qualify, as does, arguably, the 2004 USA Today piece [[5]]. Also see this CNN article: [6]. Fiachra10003 (talk) 01:04, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.