Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcy Borders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Mjroots (talk) 06:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marcy Borders

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Delete: cannot derive notability as an indiscriminate VICTIM. I know -- I must be a heartless bastard. It's just not fair to others who survived and who died from the 9/11 attacks and have no other claims to notability. There may be more AFDs in this vein coming but I don't know how to piggyback them. Sorry. Quis separabit? 22:45, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 23:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No real reason offered for deletion. Toffanin (talk) 23:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are many people who have become famous for being the subject of a photograph. Enough, in fact, that there's a whole category of them. This subject has reliable coverage specifically about her and she was the subject of a play. I think she's got notability. --Cagepanes (talk) 01:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources are secondary and reliable. Victimhood/non-victimhood have nothing to do w/ WP:N. Tapered (talk) 04:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep person was the subject of an iconic photo as the article states if anything maybe we should create a page for the photo and merge this article into that. Redsky89 (talk) 05:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NOMINATION WITHDRAWN - I was focusing on 9/11 aspect but apparently the notability in this case was the iconic photograph. Live and learn. Sorry for the inconvenience. Quis separabit? 05:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.