Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margate Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Margate Entertainment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Easily speedy and PROD material for a seemingly now non-existent company as their website is closed (and that wouldn't be surprising considering this hasn't changed much since starting in March 2008) and all I can find are the usual business listings and some press releases here. I'm also noting that if this should be deleted, a redirect to Karl Marx's Opiate for the People should replace this. Pinging Vegaswikian, Azumanga1, Cobaltbluetony and Tangerines. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. For the reasons stated above. I note that the article was created in essentially its present form by a user whose name matches one of the co-owners of the company. David.thompson.esq (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom and David.thompson.esq. No evidence of notability in the search engines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.