Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Mathis (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 14:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Mathis

Mark Mathis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A producer notable because of one controversial film (of which he was an associate producer) and I think the article for the movie is sufficient. References are either passing mentions, don't mention him at all or are dead links. As a whole, not a notable career as an activist, film producer, DJ or media consultant, worthy of his own article on Wikipedia. When you do a search for him, you will come across a more famous Mark Mathis, a meteorologist, who has more coverage online. Liz Read! Talk! 19:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The previous AFD for this page title was for the more famous meteorologist, not this Mark Mathis. Liz Read! Talk! 18:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not a coincidence, I deleted that PROD'd article and stumbled upon this one. Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 23:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Mathis (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.