Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markelytics Solutions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 05:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Markelytics Solutions
- Markelytics Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PR for nn business Staszek Lem (talk) 21:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Being "PR" is not a reason for deletion. Being "nn" is. While the company appears to do quite a bit of work, I cannot find indepth coverage to support claim to notability. I also cannot find anyone using its work in white papers or citing it. Fails WP:GNG. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry I did not realize that abbrev PR several meanings. I meant "Press Release". And all refs are basically press releases, i.e., "routine coverage". Staszek Lem (talk) 00:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- AAAAAHHHHH. Makes sense. I should not have assumed. I just see so many editors wanting to delete articles for their promotional tone that I (as I should NOT have) assumed. Sorry. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry I did not realize that abbrev PR several meanings. I meant "Press Release". And all refs are basically press releases, i.e., "routine coverage". Staszek Lem (talk) 00:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Cannot find any valid references for the coverage of article. Josu4u (talk) 00:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I cannot find any sources either. Does not meet WP:GNG nor establish notability. Zpeopleheart (talk) 06:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as there's no better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 18:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.