Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Market Forces (ChuckleVision)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge, which in this case simply means redirect, as there doesn't seem to be any actual information in need of being transferred first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Market Forces (ChuckleVision)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely non-notable television episode. The PROD-tag was removed by the article creator without a justification ╟─Treasury Tag►presiding officer─╢ 07:56, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with other episode articles to create series level episode lists with one or two sentence synopsis of "plot" for each episode. Episodes are not notable enough to warrent individual articles. To me, to you... Catfish Jim & the soapdish 11:16, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you could helpfully provide some third-party sources to demonstrate notability for individual series in that case? Thanks. ╟─Treasury Tag►person of reasonable firmness─╢ 11:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe the original contributor of the article can? If not, you're probably right. Perhaps merge the whole lot to List of ChuckleVision episodes as per WP:TVEP. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 18:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of ChuckleVision episodes. Admittedly there's not much in this article that isn't on the list already but it would be acceptable to include the plot summary there. Hut 8.5 14:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing referenced in the article at all... ╟─Treasury Tag►CANUKUS─╢ 11:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Firsfron of Ronchester 09:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.