Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Ander

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 13:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Ander (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG lacks significant coverage. Zackdasnicker (talk) 12:38, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Zackdasnicker (talk) 12:38, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, because he passes WP:GNG and doesn't lack significant coverage. This longer profile in Svenska Dagbladet is used in the article already. There's the SVT coverage presented here (not the text). Additonally, we've got pieces like this one in Trelleborgs Allehanda. Or "Nu rullar Martins motiv världen runt" in Södermanlands Nyheter, October 1 2016, p. 26 (couldn't locate it on the web). And so on. /Julle (talk) 15:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zackdasnicker: When you say "lacks significant coverage", what do you base that on? A couple of the sources I mention above are more difficult to find if you don't speak Swedish and have access to the Swedish media archive, but others were already in the article. Please explain your source review that led to this nomination. /Julle (talk) 16:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep several museum shows, while not listed as a criterion at WP:NARTIST demonstrate that Ander has been the subject of significant critical attention. Vexations (talk) 22:12, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I added a link from the prize https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_Art_Vinyl#2009_Winners (third-best in 2008 and the prize seems correctly delivered in 2009) VisbyStar (talk) 07:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This artist who works in the niche field of skateboard art has received enough coverage of his work, and has been in enough museum exhibitions (including one retrospective show) to pass WP:GNG and probably WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 14:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, clearly passes GNG thanks to significant coverage.Jackattack1597 (talk) 01:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.