Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Troakes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Troakes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly quite a busy actor over his career, but I can't see any major roles at all during his career. They have all been bit parts as far as I can see. Having many bit parts, however notable the TV shows, isn't a claim to notability. When the PROD was added this week I searched for any possible claims to meeting WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR and couldn't find any (so I left the PROD alone). PROD has now been removed by ANOther, I think it's time to take this to AfD. Sionk (talk) 10:19, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As the person to PROD the article, and seeing no improvements whatsover. The article would need sources to show WP:GNG and I have no reason to assume they are out there. Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 12:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:29, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.