Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Simpson (mathematician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Simpson (mathematician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taught mathematics for 11 years at University of St Andrews, but I am not seeing how she meets WP:GNG or WP:Notability (academic) –CaroleHenson (talk) 16:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Mathematics, Scotland, and Women. XOR'easter (talk) 20:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No pass of WP:PROF evident, sadly. There's in-depth coverage at the MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive (footnote 1 of the article), but that's only one source, and as something published at St Andrews about someone at St Andrews its independence is questionable, so it's not enough for WP:GNG. The references cited by MacTutor look to be primary and neither independent nor in-depth, so not themselves usable for GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not able to see a way to meet WP:NPROF or WP:GNG after some searching. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak-ish delete. I normally expect individuals covered by MacTutor to be notable, but I don't think it is necessarily enough on its own. There doesn't look to be much else. I did also find a passing mention in [1] as one of a number of women mathematics faculty in Great Britain in 1934, but I don't think this contributes much. Watching in case better evidence of notability arises -- it appears somewhat more plausible in this case than in the similar one of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Boyle. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 19:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.