Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masoom Shankar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Masoom Shankar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't quite meet WP:GNG, there's a fair amount of mere-mentions and gossip-blog type coverage, but nothing useful for writing an article. 2 not-terribly-successful recent films isn't enough to meet WP:NACTOR _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete, my search engine show many website which pay to article subject, but the person really considered as WP:NACTOR.Forest90 (talk) 02:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.