Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massimo Gabutti (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Massimo Gabutti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The first nomination closed with no consensus, so I'm nominating this article again. The notability problems I addressed last time are still present. Any reliable source and chart performance that is cited in this article is mostly about the groups he produced for, including Eiffel 65 (the popmatters review of eiffel 65's album doesn't even mention Gabutti one bit). The rest is basically just an uncited and unreferenced biography talking about successful songs he produced and/or wrote for, with no real in-depth coverage about him from any independent source whatsoever. Fails WP:NMUSICIAN edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 23:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 05:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 05:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nominator seems to be correct that the article is just a list of successful ventures with which this person is associated. There doesn't seem to be any coverage of him specifically in reliable sources. This seems to be a case of inherited notability. It could be that there's coverage in Italian sources which I couldn't locate; if so, the article can be recreated with better sourcing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not seeing in-depth coverage of the person to show they meet notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.