Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Math Genie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Math Genie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks notability and is only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 22:22, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the article because it's not notable itself. It's look like the goal of article is commercial and advertising, too.Forest90 (talk) 23:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per above. HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 23:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 23:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 23:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 23:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 23:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as advertising. DGG ( talk ) 16:40, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable local math tutoring business. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 16:51, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as advertising. The fact that it's not notable is also true but irrelevant in the evidence of unmitigated advertising. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:25, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Notwithstanding any issues with WP:NORG and WP:GNG, the article meets the criteria speedy for deletion WP:G11. (In that it was clearly created for promotional purposes and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with NPOV and NOTPROMO guidelines). Guliolopez (talk) 02:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG Alex-h (talk) 07:34, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and I'd say speedily but let's just kill two birds with one stone. It's not notable and it's spam. I'm also pretty sure this is a recreation of a previously AFD'd article but am unsure of the exact title. Praxidicae (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, why not just speedy delete this? It seems a prime A7 candidate as well as G11? Praxidicae (talk) 19:37, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.