Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Buschmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Oakland Athletics minor league players. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Buschmann

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run of the mill non notable minor league player. Fails WP:Athlete and WP:GNG. Also not notable enough for a re-direct. Yankees10 22:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Oakland Athletics minor league players. Why have those pages if you're not going to use them for what they are for. Alex (talk) 23:03, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They are not for guys like this. Good prospects and 40-man roster players should be on those pages not non-prospects and journeyman like this dude.--Yankees10 23:10, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Oakland Athletics minor league players. I would generally agree with what Yankees10 said, but in this case I support a merge since Buschmann is currently playing at AAA. Northern Antarctica (₵) 22:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah he's in Triple-A, but he is also 30 year old journeyman. Like I said above, the minor league articles should be for top prospects and 40-man guys.--Yankees10 22:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unless that's a policy, I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. I don't see much harm in including AAA players on team minor league pages. Northern Antarctica (₵) 22:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:43, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as above. There is no need to delete, he is in Triple A after all. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 14:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.