Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Bushell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Bushell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable actor. Quis separabit? 00:53, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Working actor? Yes. Solid notability even generally? No. SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Not only no evidence he passes the GNG, but I'd be open to a speedy either for failure to make an assertion of notability or an unsourced BLP. Ravenswing 08:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not a proper candidate for speedy deletion under A7 because the substantial list of movie credits, including a role in a blockbuster like Twilight, is sufficient to make a credible assertion of importance (a lesser standard than notability); nor under WP:BLPPROD because the article has had a source (IMDb) since it was created, thus taking it out of the purview of BLPPROD, and moreover I did manage to turn up a reliable source—a Boston Herald article [1]—that confirms in cursory fashion that he's a movie actor from Framingham. But beyond the one-sentence mention in that article, I've come across nothing informative at all.--Arxiloxos (talk) 01:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above points as notability is not established. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubbish computer (talk • contribs) 13:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Admin note: The following content was originally posted on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articles for deletion/Matt Bushell which duplicated the OP here. I have merged it into this AfD as this one is at the correctly parsed title; the transplanted !votes begin HERE. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom - Non notable actor - No evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 01:51, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Have found some sources for the page. This may help. Thanks --TheDomain (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Admin note: The transplanted !votes end HERE. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.