Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Lees

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Lees

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm aware of Matt Lees but I honestly don't think there is enough information of him to notable enough to get a page on his own. Especially with the article being full of original research. GamerPro64 03:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Based on the video game reliable sources custom Google search, he appears best known for a video related to a copyright infringement claim, but has no articles written about his work, etc. As such, the topic lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) czar 07:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This journalist released a two videos that went 'viral' at the time of the PS4 and XboxOne releases - this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rJDn0jRnUQ and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOxdMQhDMIU - third party mentions might form the basis of notability, but otherwise can't see much likelyhood that notability criteria will be reached. Suggest delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.174.82 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.