Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Nevarez (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret account 17:20, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Nevarez

Matt Nevarez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable minor league player. Can't tell if he's still with the Pittsburgh org or not, but it doesn't seem like there's enough out there for a merge to even be worth it. Wizardman 19:53, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He's not the type of player that should be on those minor league pages.--Yankees10 20:46, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's your opinion. Alex (talk) 21:24, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it's the opinion of many. Thats why you were told not to re-direct a bunch of 30 year old journeymen a few months ago.--Yankees10 21:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But I did it anyway! Fight the power! Alex (talk) 23:19, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Spanneraol (talk) 23:06, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Just one dude's observation about the guy, not even really any reason to keep if you're adamant against it but...Nevarez is a strikeout pitcher (248 Ks in 211.2 innings), so he'll probably stick around a little longer and get a few more chances than the average hurler if past history has any bearing. Alex (talk) 19:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment He has received some decent coverage in the past: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] <--cache that might not load, it's a profile on him, [6] Alex (talk) 00:07, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Nevarez (3rd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.