Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Senior

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G12. (non-admin closure) Mr. Magoo (talk) 23:19, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Senior

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication of meeting WP:GNG. Only references are to unreliable sources. noq (talk) 18:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there seem to be a number of Matt Seniors out there, but I too can't find a single reliable source for this one. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Young (17) auteur, excruciatingly detailed article, but I too find no sources to reference. Fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. — Sam Sailor 03:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - previously speedily deleted on of after 24 August 2016. No better now. Wholly promotional. Could be speedied again IMHO. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 15:22, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a copyvio of his website, and tagged as such. --Finngall ^talk 18:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He's got the ideas for success in entertainment, but whether he's got the talent (and gets the vital luck that's needed in writing, music and acting...) time will show. As of now, it's well too soon. I gave up on trying to check the copyvio - I lost patience with the website. Peridon (talk) 21:15, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.