Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Dodd (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:15, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Dodd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one of the sources, a local newspaper, verifies anything; no indication of notability. Peter James (talk) 19:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He has created a documentary on a specific incident in World War II, and has worked as a camerman, at one point rating second camerman. He is only 18, so he may well go on to be a truly notable cinematographer or director, but he is not there yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:TOOSOON. Not enough coverage at present for the subject to meet WP:BASIC. Qwfp (talk) 10:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability. Agree with nomination and previous comments. Derek Andrews (talk) 01:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.