Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maud Shaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maud Shaw

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and guidelines for WP:BIO articles per WP:NOTINHERITED. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 18:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This nom is spot on, the notability is inherited and this subject is not notable for inclusion on Wikipedia. All About That Bass (A word?? / Stalking not allowed...) 18:27, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - notability is not inherited Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. (Or perhaps add to List of nannies who worked for second sons of Joseph Kennedy, the Duke of Cambridge (Massachusetts).) Clarityfiend (talk) 02:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet WP:BIO. --Inother (talk) 17:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.