Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max (cigarette)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:07, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Max (cigarette) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find reliable sources to verify almost anything in the article. CigarettesPedia is user-generated content, and the other two sites appear to be operated by random people, with minimal review. Several other wikis have articles on Max, but I couldn't find any usable sources there either. The most I've found is a handful of passing mentions, stating that Lorillard owns the Max brand. Sunmist (talk) 10:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 10:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, the generic name makes it a bit difficult, but even searching Max+Lorillard to narrow it down, I too was unable to find any substantive content about the brand. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:57, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: not seeing the quality sourcing needed for a GNG pass. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 20:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.