Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Lloyd-Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to War for the Planet of the Apes. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Max Lloyd-Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of sources to establish general notability outside of the movie War for the Planet of the Apes, and lacking enough significant roles needed for WP:NACTOR. Article was previously a redirect to War for the Planet of the Apes, but given some other roles currently listed in the present version of the article, plus Adventures in Babysitting, I'm not sure restoring this to a redirect sounds like a good idea. MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore redirect. This one doesn't need to go through AfD – boldly restoring the redirect would have been justified. As a sidenote, I created Draft:Max Lloyd-Jones a while back, intending to see if this subject is independently notable, but got side-tracked and never made a stab at it. But, for right now, restoring the redirect sounds like the correct call in this case. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Restore redirect. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. I started this as a redirect to War for the Planet of the Apes, his only significant role to date. Another editor expanded it into an article. Not yet notable enough. Edwardx (talk) 12:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or redirect (although I prefer the first). This is because of a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources, apart from this one article I found ([1]). But, we need more significant coverage than just that, but there is none. Additionally, it fails WP:NACTOR, as this person is not a star in multiple notable films. Thus, it should be deleted. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 20:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a bunch of small roles does not notability make.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.