Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxim Cheeran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 14:25, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maxim Cheeran

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass NPROF. Natureium (talk) 19:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:44, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:45, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This one-sentence "article" leaves much to be desired, but according to Google Scholar he is cited 2345 times.[1] --Tataral (talk) 22:09, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I think his citation record is enough for a clear pass of WP:PROF#C1. The reason I am giving this a weak keep rather than just a keep is that without better sources there is not much scope for expansion of the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete His two most cited papers are review articles - these tend to be highly cited because they are useful for introductions to papers, but are not really evidence of the author's personal impact on the field. He got his PhD nearly 20 years ago, and has an h-index of 20 to show for it. This is solid, but not in any way exceptional. He is the archetype of an "average professor". Polyharrisson (talk) 17:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep based on citation record (5 articles with 100+ citations). hroest 19:17, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 03:20, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

keep citation record satisfy NACADEMIC#1. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:58, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.