Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxximize Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Spinnin' Records. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maxximize Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity label run by Blasterjaxx, no indication of notability under the criteria of WP:MUSIC. Redirect to Spinnin' Records. Karst (talk) 21:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - notable label that can use expansion. There are significant coverage of reliable sources on Google. Redirect - changing my vote because all the sources I found were just passing mentions. - TheMagnificentist 06:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep - That's right. It's a notable label that can use expansion. There are significant coverage of reliable sources on Google. 141.138.146.132 (talk) 10:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• • I'm staying out of this a little bit since I got involved with the creator's unblock request, but I just want to point out that the above users provide no proof of notability. Drmies (talk) 04:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect and merge into Spinnin' Records. No authoritative references are provided and nothing shows notability on its own.--Rpclod (talk) 03:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this label has brought no releases charting nationally or even in dance charts. I think the article is not notable. Stillnix (talk) 08:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.