Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Me and Mae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Me and Mae

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO, depending on single source to support claims of notability. Google results look like press release material, assuming my bubble is being honest. Dolescum (talk) 13:51, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 01:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment They have media coverage but it's mostly local and interviews: local press[1][2], radio[3], and TV[4][5][6][7][8]. Websites of uncertain reliability[9][10]. Not convinced of notability yet. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 07:39, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete--There is no major news source regarding this band in the music trades in either Canada or the US. This fails WP:BAND and WP:MUSICBIO. I also would not think that a group that is not fully formed or has just recently added players to their group would have had enough time to gain notability. As early as 2013 they were still looking for members>[11]. This one needs to wait until it gains more notability.Canyouhearmenow 12:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.