Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meagan Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Meagan Taylor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this article meets Wikipedia's notability standards. I don't believe the article significant independent coverage (both links are articles with accounts made by Meagan / her father. I believe the this was a flash in the pan (no long term interest). Finally I also believe this article is promotional in nature although very subtle (someone financed a music video independently, so this make them no different than any other youtube user but for the quality of production. Lcaraway (talk) 22:00, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The references (which are secondary WP:RS from Canada and Panama, not primary sources as claimed) support WP:MUSBIO #11 (Panamanian airplay). The one primary link seems dead, although seems available at archive.org - no current promotional factor. Some additional coverage seems available e.g. ew.com. Not the strongest notability, not a lasting career, but neither have any deletion criteria been clearly established. Dl2000 (talk) 05:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for your feedback. I feel like from the articles provided there is mention of heavy rotation in one of them but it isn't independently verified. If you check the canada.com article and check the context it appears the entire article, and the assertion of airplay is just first person feedback from the artist/manager and not the journalist the article is attributed to. The article isn't even attributed or signed off by, the journalist cited in the wiki page. Lcaraway (talk) 22:53, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Lcaraway[reply]

Delete - I also found the EW article which is weak for establishing notability. There is the assertion of airplay, but I don't see any sort of coverage beyond the one time flash in the pan coverage here. Notability is not temporary, and this seems to be just a blip of temporary fame. I see no reviews of any of her work. In fact, I cannot find any evidence of an album or anything aside from the song and video. -- Whpq (talk) 15:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.